Which kind of writer are you? –Part 1

February 16, 2010 | Karl Schroeder | Comments (7)

Writing is not one activity.  It is many.  Knowing this can be key to your growth as a literary artist.

There are a lot of myths about the writing process.  One of the worst is the myth of talent–which is a catch-all word that seems designed to stop any further questioning.  Talent, you see, is self-contained, impenetrable:  opaque.  "Well, he's talented."  With that statement, we dismiss the possibility of looking inside the box, of finding out what it is that a writer does that makes him or her look talented.

Talent, like the words skill and experience, is useless when you want to learn how someone does something.  Each of these terms takes something complex, multi-faceted and ultimately visible–if you know where to look–and makes it mysterious and opaque.  So if I used any of these words in conversation or on this blog while I'm writer in residence here, please feel free to call me on it.

Underlying the apparen't seamlessness of talent and skill are many different activities, all coordinated. Writing is not one activity but many, and each of us is not just 'a writer' but many different kinds of writer. 

We are all a mixture of many different kinds of writer; but some of us start out being more one or two of these:

  • The
    dreamer
    has a whole universe in his
    head, but can’t get that first scene written.
  • The
    draft horse
    has nine different versions of chapter 1, but no chapter 2.
  • The
    academic
    has lots of file folders crammed with notes, but hasn’t started
    the story yet.
  • The
    editor
    never finishes because the story “just isn’t quite right
    yet.”
  • The
    biographer
    has two hundred pages of dialog and character development, but
    nothing has actually happened yet.
  • The plotter
    has a lot of action going on, but there are no people in this story.
  • The
    essayist
    uses the story to make a point, and woe to any character or drama
    that gets in the way.

Recognize any of these traits?  Chances are you have some of them.  In my next post, I'll talk about how it is enthusiasm, and not some mythical trait like 'talent' that blends these personae in us; and I'll discuss how to dampen down the traits that you are over-emphasizing, and turn up the volume on the ones you tend to neglect.  A good writer knows when to switch between these roles, and is willing to do it.  We'll explore how that works, and how it can improve your writing.

Comments

7 thoughts on “Which kind of writer are you? –Part 1

  1. Hmmm. I’m a Dreamer who has actually managed to write the first scene. And the second. And this after writing a whole lot of disparate scenes which on reflection I decided I couldn’t stitch together to form a coherent narrative. Still, I’m inclined to agree with those more experienced writers (ie anyone who’s managed to actually finish a story) who say that the important thing is to stick at it. Nulla dies sin linea etc. Also, I find reading poorly written novels to be a great boost to one’s confidence.

    Reply
  2. Hmmm…a dreaming biographer? Like Simon, I write brief scenes that I end up liking a lot and finessing, but I have trouble connecting them together, or developing them past the point of a moment.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *